« Dying Into Life | Main | How The Sopranos Ends III »

Abortion By the Numbers

11 Jun 2007 11:24 am

Back to Dana Stevens, and "the 77 percent of Americans who support abortion rights—and the 40 percent or more of American women who have exercised that right." Ramesh says most of what needs to be said about the first statistic, which may be technically "true," but only if you count as "pro-choice" voters who support legal abortion in cases of rape, incest, fetal deformity, and so forth. (That is, in a vanishingly small percentage of all abortions.) The numbers on abortion are almost infinitely malleable, depending on how you ask the question, but there seems to be a consistent constituency of around forty percent for the current abortion regime, around twenty percent for the strict pro-life positions, and around forty percent for further restrictions of varying degrees. Pro-lifers like to say that seventy percent of Americans oppose ninety percent of abortions (or variations on that theme), which is a little bit of a stretch, but at least as close to the truth as what Stevens is claiming.

Stevens' second statistic - the percentage of American women who have had abortions - is likewise dubious, though it may not be all that far off. I haven't found a really rigorous analysis of this question, but the Guttmacher Institute says "at current rates more than one-third will have had an abortion by age 45," while the National Abortion Federation (presumably drawing on the same data) says "35% of all women of reproductive age in America today will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45." So not quite forty percent, but within hailing distance. I can't find the underlying data that Guttmacher and the NAF are using, so I did some of back-of-the-envelope math using this Guttmacher figure:

abortionsper1000.jpg

Given that almost half of all abortions are repeat abortions, my calculations suggest that if the 2001 rate held for the following twenty-nine years, a girl who was fifteen in that year would have roughly a 29 percent chance of having at least one abortion over her reproductive lifetime. That's lower than the Guttmacher estimate, but then again the '01 rate was the lowest in a generation; if the far higher 1981 rate held for a generation, my back-of-the-envelope math suggests that forty percent of women would have at least one abortion over that span. So maybe that's where Stevens' number comes from, and the 35 percent number that Guttmacher cites averages out the last couple decades. But if there's a more detailed analysis out there I'd love to see it.

Comments (13)

from wiki, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade#Public_opinion:


An April 2006 Harris poll on Roe v. Wade, asked the following question:

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that states laws which made it illegal for a woman to have an abortion up to three months of pregnancy were unconstitutional, and that the decision on whether a woman should have an abortion up to three months of pregnancy should be left to the woman and her doctor to decide. In general, do you favor or oppose this part of the U.S. Supreme Court decision making abortions up to three months of pregnancy legal?[33]

In reply, 49% of respondents indicated favor while 47% indicated opposition; the Harris organization concluded from this poll that "49 percent now support Roe vs. Wade." Critics assert that the media often misreport polls on Roe v. Wade.[34] The Harris poll question dealt with first trimester abortions, whereas Roe decided that a woman can get a pre-viability abortion for any reason, without regard to any concern her doctor may have about protecting the fetus, well beyond the first trimester.[1] The Harris poll has tracked public opinion about Roe since 1973:[35]

There's a more fundamental problem with Stevens's use of the 77 percent statistic for in this discussion.

In essence, she's conflating support for the current legal abortion regime with moral approval of the abortion procedure itself.

Such a conflation would undercut the entire pro-choice argument, unless pro-choice really does mean pro-abortion.

You can't draw reliable conclusions about the level of public support for Roe from a single poll. Even with multiple polls, it's problematic. Part of the problem is the difficulty of translating restrictions on abortion that people may say they want in the abstract into a workable law. As long as there's a broad health "exception," women will continue to be able to get abortions more-or-less on demand, more-or-less throughout pregnancy. After all, it's not terribly hard to fake suicidal or self-destructive thoughts or behavior, and if there's even a small risk of a woman killing or seriously harming herself over an unwanted pregnancy, I think most doctors and most people would err on the side of caution and permit her to have an abortion.

Ross,

I really wish you would clear up what your real disagreement with Dana Stevens is. You both agree that KNOCKED UP does not present abortion as a rational choice that a decent, confused human being would make. You and Stevens both agree that abortion is presented as a form of criminal deviance because in true Hollywood style it is suggested by respectively an irresponsible character, and by a horrible one. You and Stevens both agree that, however much numbers-quibbling you engage in, this does not reflect reality.

So what, exactly, are you disagreeing about on a fundamental level??

I think the disagreement is that for Stevens, not presenting abortion as a legitimate moral choice is not realistic, whereas from Douthat's perspective, it is realistic.

Thank you John, you've clarified the potential disagreement admirably. But given that Ross said this:

"Um, that's precisely why I said it's naively pro-life - because it doesn't really acknowledge the existence of a pro-choice case that isn't associated with horrible mothers and misognyist roommates. Again, it's not me that Stevens should be arguing with; it's Apatow."

I tend to doubt your interpretation, unless Ross himself openly says that he, Ross, believes that abortion cannot be a legitimate moral choice, and not Apatow.

So, is it Ross Douthat who believes that abortion is necessarily illegitimate morally, or is it Judd Apatow?

Well, I think it's Ross, or more precisely, Ross's vision of the protagonists in the movie.

IOW, the perspective may be "naively pro-life." From Stevens' perspective, that alone makes it unrealistic. I think Douthat is saying that this is a perspective that is somewhat common and realistic.

You can "think" whatever you like, I'd like to see Ross Douthat clarify his substantial disagreement with Stevens. Seems to me she pointed out a central weakness of the film, and that he agrees with her - it is a weakness.

After he's clarified his essential disagreement with Stevens, as opposed to engaging in childish nitpicking and "I said she said" we can deal with the real issues. So far I just the mischief of a punk.

The Guttmacher Institute has estimated that at the abortion rates prevailing in 2000, about one-third of women would have an abortion by age 45. This estimate takes into account age-specific abortion rates and subtracts out the repeat abortions of each age group. I can’t replicate Douthat’s estimate of 29 percent, but he should have followed the women for thirty years rather than twenty-nine, and according to government figures, 45 percent of abortions were repeat procedures in 2003, not half. Also, his calculation does not take age-specific rates into account, as ours does.

Abortion rates were higher in the past, and an earlier study found that 43% of women would have an abortion at rates prevailing in 1992. In that study, we also tracked the experience of a cohort of women starting in 1973, when abortion became legal nationally, looking only at first abortions. By 1994, we estimated that 40% of women then aged 30-34 had had one or more abortions since 1973. Thus, today about 40% of women in their 40s have in fact had an abortion. Stevens may have been aware of our earlier studies.

Stanley K. Henshaw, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow
Guttmacher Institute

buy viagra where

buy cheapest viagra http://magic-pills-swicki.eurekster.com/Buy+Viagra+Online buy viagra online buy kineret.siamforum.com viagra

toxiferous nonclose anasarcous kinematic oenomaus tractability immoment undergirdle
http://members.aol.com/usteach/ >Home Crusaders
http://www.outingclub.com

Wow, cool man, big thanks! http://rgrzgfqiafk.com