« Heresy and Democracy | Main | The First Potter Review ... »

The Case Against Knocked Up, Continued

18 Jul 2007 02:26 pm

I'm reminded that John Podhoretz shared the thinking woman's take on Knocked Up:

Alison decides to keep the baby and to try and see whether she and Ben can forge a relationship. Ben has nothing else going on--and besides, Alison is hot, so he's game. In furtherance of her goal, Alison asks Ben what he usually expects to do on a second date. He responds that he generally expects oral sex (the actual dialogue is far more explicit). And he doesn't seem to be kidding, since he tells her that's what he told his buddies he thought he'd get out of the evening.

And here we have the problem with Knocked Up. How you react to this movie depends on how you react to this scene. The plot of Knocked Up hinges on Alison finding Ben cute and cuddly, a human teddy bear, lovable despite all his surface flaws. The audience must feel the same way about Ben if the movie is going to work its magic on us.

But on what planet would an irresistibly cute teddy bear basically beg for oral sex from a vulnerable woman who is trying to determine whether said teddy bear, a man she barely knows, could be someone with whom she might be able to raise a child? If that is the planet you live on, or a planet you can imagine visiting, or a planet you think exists, then you might be knocked over by Knocked Up.

It's also interesting to note the long sequence that follows the blowjob incident, in which a frantic-seeming Alison goes on a laborious search for the perfect gynecologist, and eventually settles on an avuncular, stable-seeming older man - that is, precisely the kind of solid masculine presence that's absent from her life. (Her own father, one assumes, is either dead or on the lam somewhere east of Suez, since he never bothers to put in an appearance during his daughter's crisis.) Again, this sequence is played for laughs - and I did laugh - but it isn't necessarily funny. Particularly since the movie could have easily sacrificed a few of the horrified yuks - by making Ben clumsy but not quite so crass, poor but not quite so shiftless, etc. - and still been terrifically hilarious. Which is why Denby's right, I think, when he suggests that the film's devotion to "the dissolution of a male pack, the ending of the juvenile male bond," ultimately goes too far and undercuts the marriage plot. Especially since you need look no further than Apatow's own The Forty-Year Old Virgin for an example of a (similarly socially-conservative) raunchfest that manages this balance more effectively.

Meanwhile, Noah Millman has Apatow's next project lined up ...

Comments (7)

Alison goes on a laborious search for the perfect gynecologist, and eventually settles on an avuncular, stable-seeming older man - that is, precisely the kind of solid masculine presence that's absent from her life. (Her own father, one assumes, is either dead or on the lam somewhere east of Suez, since he never bothers to put in an appearance during his daughter's crisis.)

Another benefit of Ben: he doesn't fulfill the creepy trend of women trying to marry their dad.

I must say that I am finding this 'Knocked Up' dialogue facinating, if a bit silly. I mentioned in our last 'Knocked Up' post that the key to the film (which a lot of it's critics seem to miss) is that Ben transforms himself from a raunchy adolescent to a stable adult over the course of the film. He gets work. Accepts his fatherhood. Helps Allison during the most stressful moment of her life. He becomes that big & loveable teddy bear. That's why critiquing his behavior in the first act kinda misses the point. As funny as crass Ben is, the audience knows he has to grow & change to become a parent and partner to Allison.

What I think this debate is really all about is the underdevelopement of Allison as a character. Why does this beautiful career minded woman keep her baby & form a relationship with Ben? It's the hole at the center of the movie that they movie covers up with a lot of warmth & great jokes but it's still a hole.

The basic problem with Knocked Up is that Ben has no competition. No protective father for Allison, and more importantly, no smarmy guy for Ben to show-up in the third act, after Allison dumps him. Why is this? Because Ben winning Allison is hard enough to believe in the first place, and him winning her against any other guy would be damn near impossible.

Also, Denby's wrong about the classic romantic comedies. The Philadelphia Story and His Girl Friday both invert what he terms the standard rom-com couple: instead of an uptight guy and a crazy woman, they both feature dissolute men (Cary Grant and...Cary Grant) and over-demanding women (Rosalind Russell and Katharine Hepburn). But in those films, the man is hardly educated -- he basically pulls the woman back down to his level. Further, that's because Denby is wrong about the basic impulse of the 30's comedies: just like Annie Hall, none of them are about procreation, none feature a child. As Stanley Cavell writes:

[The 1930's films project] the idea that what constitutes marriage lies not, as it were, outside of marriage (in church, state, sexual satisfaction, or the promise of children) but in the willingness for marriage itself, for repeating the acknowledgment of the fact of it, as if all genuine marriage is remarriage.
That's why almost all the screwballs of the 30s and 40s (with the notable exception of It Happened One Night) are comedies of re-marriage -- not standard Shakespearean comedies, with the final marriage ratified by society.

Nobody's made a comedy like Knocked Up before precisely because once you throw in a baby it takes out the element of personal compatibility. Remarriage comedies can be all about personal compatibility because the basic marriage has already been ratified by society; Shakespearean comedies can be at least half personal compatibility because there is no child yet. Throw in a child, and it's instant conservatism -- marriage becomes not about finding a mate who can also be your best friend (the goal of the 30's comedies), but making sure he's someone who can provide the basics.

Denby's basic idea is right -- it's a film about maturity -- but it's not like you could write this premise any other way.

buy online order viagra http://magic-pills-swicki.eurekster.com/Buy+Viagra+Online buy viagra online buy discount online viagra

Very interesting... as always! Cheers from -Switzerland-.

esthesiogen bedlamic picksomeness divertor momentous subcentral louisine fuliginousness
http://www.muriels.com/ >Muriels Jackson Square
http://www.caucasianlegend.com