« The Morning After | Main | An Acceptable Time »

Being There

07 Sep 2007 03:51 pm

In the latest issue of the Atlantic, Christopher Hitchens has a wonderfully savage review of Philip Roth's new novel, in which he punctuates his summary of what sounds like a dull rehash of better Roth plots by remarking "Am I by any chance boring you?" And then, later, "Are you absolutely sure that I am not boring you?" It isn't the most cutting line in the piece (that one has to do with oral sex of a particularly unpleasant variety, but you'll have to subscribe to read it, I'm afraid), but it's the one that seems most applicable to the candidacy of ol' Fred Thompson, who looks more and more like the political equivalent of a bad Philip Roth novel - that is, a mediocre simulacrum of a far superior product.

For instance, Thompson went on Hannity and Colmes last night, and one of the questions Hannity asked him was this:

When you look at the other current crop of candidates, Republicans, where is the distinction between your positions and what you view as theirs?

Seems like a pretty important question for a candidate - especially one jumping into the race late - to answer. Now sure, a twenty-minute interview on Fox News isn't the time or place for a terribly substantive answer, but you'd think that Thompson would have something to offer - some one-liner, at least, about how "I'm the only candidate who X, or Y, or Z." Not so much:

Well, to tell you the truth, I haven't spent a whole lot of time going into the details of their positions. I will be doing — I mean, publicly. I obviously know where they stand and what they have done and what they've written.

And there will be a time when we will need to have a good debate, if they are interested in debates, and we will do it one-on-one or we will do it in a big group, however they want to do it. And we will get into that.

Right now, I have got a lot of work to do about myself. It is essentially going to boil down between — as far as I'm concerned, between myself and the American people, myself and the people of Iowa, initially, and then the people of New Hampshire and South Carolina and as we go along. And I want to make sure that nobody else, not the commentators and not the press or anybody else, makes these decisions. The American people need to make these decisions as to who they think will be the best president.

If I do what I'm supposed to do, and if I'm in sync with the American people, and I have the priorities that they think should be our nation's priorities, it doesn't matter what any of these other guys say or do, because taking the position is an important thing.

But you also have to ask, where has that person been before? How does that compare with what he is today? And more importantly, where will he be tomorrow when the strong winds blow?

Are you absolutely sure I am not boring you?

Comments (12)

He forgot the part about how U.S. Americans need to send maps to Iraq and South Africa. For the children.

Hey, at least he's not likely to wander around a stage looking forlornly for the exit---so definitely a step above the present Repub crop.

Gee, Ross, aren't you supposed to leave the bitchy stuff to Andy Sullivan?

"and we'll get into that..."

Is he promising a debate on when and how they'll debate?

THOMPSON'S RESPONSE REMINDS ME OF TEDDY'S RAMBLING ANSWER TO THE QUESTION OF "WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE PRESIDENT?".

He's the Republican 08 analogue of Wes Clark in 04 -- fair amount of buzz before he actually gets in, then an embarrassing wet fizzle of unpreparedness as soon as he's in.

"THOMPSON'S RESPONSE REMINDS ME OF TEDDY'S RAMBLING ANSWER TO THE QUESTION OF "WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE PRESIDENT?".

Posted by MARTIN COYNE | September 8, 2007 12:09 PM"

To criminalize the caps lock key?

All over the country Repiglicans are convening secret meanings where they're praying and crying and begging for their only hope to enter the 2008 race.

Yes, the want Jesus Christ to throw his loincloth into the ring.

They figure he'd appeal to at least 51% of the electorate, even though he'd be an illegal alien (of some sort) and even if he didn't he could manipulate the results with his magic.

And here I was hoping he was going to launch into a discussion of gardening that everyone but him would take as a metaphor.

A Romney supporter calling Fred Thompson vapid is like Jimmy Carter calling Bush the worst prez ever. Fred has detailed his positions in radio commentaries and in blogs and newspaper editorials with far more specifics than anyone but McCain. When people see Fred on the podium next to the lackluster crew we have to pick from now he won't have to be an attack dog.

Well, he may not have much hope of being elected President, but I hear that Fred is now favored to be the next Miss South Carolina.

wayne s writes: "A Romney supporter calling Fred Thompson vapid is like Jimmy Carter calling Bush the worst prez ever."

But they'd both be right.