« A Race Nobody Can Win | Main | Theocracy Versus Totalitarianism »

The Golden Compass

09 Dec 2007 03:24 pm

You should read Hanna Rosin's piece on the making of the movie, and her review of the finished product; you can find my own (none-too-favorable) review in the next National Review. But to understand what went wrong with Chris Weitz' adaptation, look no further than this:

Mr. Weitz says that if he gets to film the rest of the trilogy, he will begin right where the current movie leaves off. “I mean to protect the integrity of those remaining chapters,” he explained. “The aim is to put in the elements we need to make this movie a hit, so that we can be much less compromising in how the second and third books are shot.”

Translation: "I know I made a mediocre movie, but hopefully people will go see it anyway and the studio will give me a chance to make the sequels the way I want to make them." Sadly, with a $26 million opening weekend, The Golden Compass has a long way to go to make that bet pay off. (And Compass was the best of the books anyway ...)

More in this vein here.

Comments (7)

So what you're saying is, it was less North By Northwest and more South by Southeast. And any sequels could be Due South.

Hey: what's wrong with Due South? Paul Gross is a fine actor.

Kidman as the unemotional, unfeeling Ice Princess was perfect. Too much botox for any form of emoting anyway. In real life she is a worse 'Mommie Dearest' than the original. But in this film she is perfectly cast.

I don't know much about the movie industry, but it seems like a more sensible strategy would be "let's make this movie cheap enough that nobody notices I'm doing it my way". Obviously the more expensive something is, the more big business politics are involved.

Excellent film.

Worth seeing, but not worth going to see.

I saw the movie, twice.
It's action packed, has a great cast, and awesome visuals.