Yuval Levin doesn't like McCain's "tolerance" ad any more than I did, but Andrew begs to differ:
It's an encouraging sign that McCain is not going to pull a Rove this fall; it's a deft way of dealing with racial difference - check out the number of African-Americans in the ad - and it co-opts the "Goodbye To All That" appeal of Obama. A bit syrupy - and McCain doesn't always live up to its message. But it suggests to me that McCain has figured out the public mood. And sees himself as a unifying father-figure. That's shrewd and encouraging.
Just to be clear: I don't dislike the message of the ad, necessarily. I think McCain can and should promise (as a certain Texas Governor did, once upon a time) to "change the tone" in Washington, and I think his record as a bipartisan bridge-builder will be crucial to his campaign. I just think the ad itself is terrible - bloated, meandering and deadly dull, a soporific civics lecture delivered in a medium that rewards brevity, energy, and wit. Keep the message, by all means, but lose the packaging.





It might be helpful to note that "tolerance" no longer has just its dictionary meaning. That word is like "hate" in that way. So, for instance, the CenterforAmericanProgress refers to right-wing talkradio as "hate radio", and various groups use complaints about "hate" to hide the fact that they're supporting illegal activity.
Here's the UN using the word "tolerance": lonewacko.com/blog/archives/005892.html
And, here's another group using it as a cover for support for illegal activity:
lonewacko.com/blog/archives/004564.html
I'm sure others can provide many other examples.
The bottom line is that, whatever he thinks he's trying to get at, McCain is playing on the far-left's field under their fixed rules and somehow he's expecting it to work out OK.
Posted by TLB | April 9, 2008 11:41 PM