« McCain's Policy Problem | Main | Liberals in the Foxhouse »

Looking For Sister Souljah

02 May 2008 09:31 am

Mark Krikorian isn't taken with Richelieu's remark about McCain needing "a Souljah moment with GOP orthodoxy":

What? McCain's whole career is one long Sister Souljah moment. Now, distancing himself from Bush is necessary, because otherwise he's just running for Bush's third term, but putting some bly sky between himself and president is not what I'd call a "Sister Souljah moment."

But this, of course, is precisely McCain's problem. In a year when the GOP desperately needs a candidate who can put some distance between himself and the "Bush Republican" brand, it has a candidate who had put so much distance between himself and Bush Republicanism in the past (and pissed off so many conservatives along the way) that the only way he could win the nomination was to run a deeply cautious and conventional primary campaign, which in turn seems to be restricting his general-election options.

This doesn't mean that McCain was the wrong choice for primary voters: His rivals had the same problem to varying degrees, which is why nobody was able to pull of the deft maneuver that George W. Bush managed in 1999, when he deliberately defined himself against the unpopular Congressional GOP. (Mike Huckabee came closest to attempting something like this, with his war against the Club for Growth, but he was fighting from a position of enormous weakness vis-a-vis the right-wing establishment, whereas Bush circa 1999, as the pedigreed front-runner, was fighting from a position of enormous strength.)

But with McCain, there's the additional difficulty that his instincts often incline him toward Souljah moments - from campaign-finance reform to cap-and-trade - that win plaudits from liberal pundits but don't necessarily excite the voting public. Whereas for all the Bush Administration's weaknesses, it did seem to understand that if you're going to piss off movement conservatives, it pays to do it on kitchen-table issues like health care and education, where's there's a possibility that a little heterodoxy might actually swing large numbers of votes the GOP's way. In this case and this case only, the McCain campaign could profit from Bush's example.

Comments (6)

But this, of course, is precisely McCain's problem. In a year when the GOP desperately needs a candidate who can put some distance between himself and the "Bush Republican" brand, it has a candidate who had put so much distance between himself and Bush Republicanism in the past (and pissed off so many conservatives along the way) that the only way he could win the nomination was to run a deeply cautious and conventional primary campaign, which in turn seems to be restricting his general-election options.

Exactly right.

Ergo, what McCain needs in some heterodoxy that doesn't upset movement conservatives. He needs to come out for a massive overhaul of the War on Drugs, including legalization of marijuana.

He establishes his own Maverick Brand and many movement conservatives and libertarians would back him on the issue. And most importantly it's an issue where he wouldn't just be Democrat-lite.

I think Ross' post is brilliant.

The only thing I would add is that there is still plenty of time. Personally, I hope McCain stays stuck in this box, because I want to see Obama win. But he has between now and November to pick up some populist issue and run with it. Maybe with sensible voices like Ross on the right calling for it, it will happen.

McCain's biggest obstacle when it comes to trying to distance himself from Bush is that the three biggest issues out there--the economy, Iraq, and healthcare--are probably the three issues upon which the Republican party is at its most dogmatic. This is why we see such a narrowed focus on porkbusting from his camp. It makes sense: he calls himself a deficit hawk and it is wasteful. Unfortunately, nobody really cares about porkbusting right now. So you see McCain trying to tie porkbarrel spending to everything (from infrastructure failure to the recession) and not getting anywhere.

I think he ought to flip on the economy. It seems like it carries the least risk. Sure, Norquist will lose his lunch, but I've always sensed that the anti-tax faction's influence is illusory. And deep down McCain's a balanced budgets guy--he should just say, the hell with tax cuts for the rich, we're going to balance the budget and pay down debt. I suspect most actual conservatives would appreciate this, and it would represent both a break from Bush as well as being conservative.

Re: the three biggest issues out there--the economy, Iraq, and healthcare--are probably the three issues upon which the Republican party is at its most dogmatic.

The GOP doesn't have to be dogmatic on healthcare. Sure, it's not going to throw in for single payer, but there are no ideological reasons it could not support a market-based approach to universal healthcare (note: not claiming such an approach would be a success). The Heritage Foundation, Mitt Romney, ex-Senator Nickles of Oklahoma, and Arnold Schwarzenegger have all put forward such proposals. The reason the GOP does not embrace these ideas is not ideology, but the never-ending shower of largesse from the most reactionary braches of the insurance industry.

What about immigration? What about the culture war issues that haunted 2004?