« The Weakness of Faith | Main | Tony Was Whacked? »

Immortal Longings

09 Jun 2008 08:38 am

Via Andrew, here's John Horgan, contributing to a symposium on the Singularity:

Let's face it. The singularity is a religious rather than a scientific vision. The science-fiction writer Ken MacLeod has dubbed it “the rapture for nerds,” an allusion to the end-time, when Jesus whisks the faithful to heaven and leaves us sinners behind.

Such yearning for transcendence, whether spiritual or technological, is all too understandable. Both as individuals and as a species, we face deadly serious problems, including terrorism, nuclear proliferation, overpopulation, poverty, famine, environmental degradation, climate change, resource depletion, and AIDS. Engineers and scientists should be helping us face the world's problems and find solutions to them, rather than indulging in escapist, pseudoscientific fantasies like the singularity.

But the very fact that the Singularity's appeal derives from some of the same impulses that drive religious faith - even as the prophets proclaiming its imminent arrival insist that they're relying on cold hard science - means that you aren't coming to make very much hay by telling the Ray Kurzweils of the world that we need to train our attention on terrorism or nuclear proliferation or famine or climate change instead. Some of the yearning for "transcendence" that the Singularity satisfies might go away in a juster, safer world, but the fundamental yearning it's addressed to - the desire for immortality - wouldn't. Eliminate terrorism and nuclear weapons, and you'll still die. Do away with poverty, clean up the environment, and ensure a fairer distribution of the earth's resources, and you'll still die. Find a cure for AIDS, and not only will you still die, but so will everybody you've cured.

Seen through this lens, telling people that they need to solve all the world's immediate problems before they take up the biggest Problem of all is like telling doctors facing a bubonic-plague outbreak that they can only address themselves to it once they've found a cure for colds, allergies, and stomach flu. Now of course this lens assumes that there could be a cure for death, which is where the issue of pseudoscience enters the picture, and the (im)plausibility of the claims the Singulatarians are making - an issue, I should note, that the substance of Horgan's essay is addressed to. But the mere fact that the Singularity is inherently "escapist," and bears a not-inconsiderable resemblance to Christianity, isn't a problem with the concept. It's the whole point.

Comments (12)

"But the mere fact that the Singularity is inherently "escapist," and bears a not-inconsiderable resemblance to Christianity, isn't a problem with the concept. It's the whole point."

That's entirely true. This post is a very perceptive take on why people choose to believe ridiculous things instead of focusing on the far more important mundane tasks of real life.

Now, turn the lens around on your own beliefs and start again from the top.

Self-styled progressive:

How insightful. I am sure that it has never yet occurred to Mr. Douthat to examine his own beliefs, and your comments seem ideally phrased to persuade him to finally remedy this.

While I'm not a Singularitist, it is at least rooted in science and its potential (think monkeys moving robot arms--with their minds), while traditional organized religion is rooted in fairy tales, myths, legends, and other assorted folklore. It's also worth noting that Singulartists do not, to my admittedly limited knowledge, seek to collect tithes or otherwise control their flock. It ain't exactly a top down situation, unlike, well, you know...

"think monkeys moving robot arms--with their minds"

Wake me up when they get to frogs moving planets with their croaks.

This is surely true of some Singularians like Frank Tipler who forecast not merely immortality, but infinitely powerful computers that manage to simulate backwards in time and bring the already dead back to life. (And Tipler's even Christian, so there you go).

I don't think it's as true for folks like Kurzweil, who seem driven less by a need for a transcendence and more by curiousity and wonder--trying to determine exactly what life would be like inside a computer.

And a lot of it is driven by the same fantasy mentality that tries to figure out how the Enterprise would fight a Star Destroyer or whether Hillary Clinton would have won the race if she had done X instead of Y. It's just a weird human tendency to ponder worlds we do not and probably never will live in, whether fantastic, terrible, or merely interesting.

Dear Sammler,

It's best to steer clear of sarcasm if you aren't qualified to handle it.

Wake me up when they get to frogs moving planets with their croaks.

Right after you look up the phrase, "rooted in." Thanks in advance.

I take your point, but it's not an exact matchup. Kurzweil for example actually makes all sorts of empirical predictions, complete with dates. Either the Singularity happens in 2050 or it doesn't. On the other hand, the Rapture is just absurd nonsense.

Yes, of course this 'Singularity' has some features of the usual Apocalyptic literature. And dolphins resemble fish in many ways. So what??

And yes, of course both literatures spring from the same human longing for a STORY, a way of putting human beings into a epic conflict that leads us into immortality. All that proves is that even nerds and liberals frequently freaked out by the idea that we are merely the random product of natural meaningless processes. But we are.

"Right after you look up the phrase, "rooted in." Thanks in advance."

Your request makes no sense. I did not misinterpret this phrase, or comment for it or against it.

Monkeys moving robot arms with neural signals. Now stop fighting.

We don't need to bother with a cure for AIDS, Ross; we can just tattoo them like Buckley suggested.

Oh, and don't use the 20 years ago argument - as late as 2005 he was still defending it.