« The Consequences of the Surge | Main | Cruel and Unusual Punishment »

The Follieri Follies

25 Jun 2008 11:59 am

Everyone no doubt will have their favorite anecdote from the saga of Raffaello Follieri, who until recently was most famous for dating Anne Hathaway and being friends with Clinton pal Ron Burkle, but now seems likely to be remembered for bilking everyone foolish enough to invest in a scheme to use his (apparently nonexistent) Vatican connections "purchase Roman Catholic Church properties in the U.S. at low prices, flip them, and sell them" out of millions of dollars. Naturally, it's the Catholic details that caught my eye:

"According to several witnesses, Follieri kept various ceremonial robes, including robes of senior clergymen, at his office in New York, New York. One witness told [the FBI agent who wrote the complaint] that he/she had been traveling with him to change out of the monsignor's robes and put on the robe of a more senior clergyman in order to create the false impression that Follieri had close ties to the Vatican."

I also liked the bit about his "engineering reports," which supposedly cost $800,000 to produce: "When he eventually submitted them to investors, the reports were, they noted, each two to five pages long, written in Italian, and contained exactly no engineering information."

Comments (16)

Everyone no doubt will have their favorite anecdote from the saga of Raffaello Follieri

Most of us really don't and couldnt care less.

Does this fall under hathetic, or celebrity nonsense, or a way for you to look at Anne Hathaway without angering thy God by committing pornadultery?

Maybe Anne Hathaway can be the next contestant on the Bachelorette. Or, join the Brat Pack (Spears, Hilton, etc.). Either way, probably plenty of clothes will be coming off in the near future.

Ross, why does your site bring out the humorless douche-bags? I mean, I enjoy MoeLarryAndJesus; he entertains me. But insufferable, whiny liberals like James? It's a blog, James. Why don't you go out an buy Douthat's book and write a review or something on YOUR blog instead of being a little bitch.

James (not me): I would clasify this less as a celebrity gossip story (Miss Hathaway seems rather peripheral to the main events) than as a weird true-crime tale, which all always have an audience - maybe not more respectable than the audience for celebrity gossip, but a different (and more masculine, FWIW) beast.

That should read "which will always have an audience."

Its a blog with open comments Marlowe, so I'm free to say what I want. That's pretty much the point.

And now ur whining about someone whining, so shut the fuck up or realise everyone is free to post. Especially your humorpacked conservative self.

If you can't see the irony of ross being self-righteous about 'blase' Iraq posts being followed with this nonsense then you really shouldn't be allowed a pencil let alone a keyboard.

I'm not particularly liberal, just not keen on hypocrites like Ross and scum like you.

Yes, James, sweetheart, you are free to post whatever your little heart desires. But you are still a humorless jackass.

Do you go over to Yglesias' blog and whine when he posts, say, a link to a Feist video? No. Because you are a d-bag.

Philip, are you a closet reader of Marlowe? Or just a closet case? Please let me know sweetheart.

Oh the shame. I meant closet reader of Yglesias.

Also Philip, given your main line of argument is to try to suggest my sexuality isn't true American hetero, I'm not sure you realise that some facts are not always dependent on other facts.

I may be straight, gay, bi, transgender, pedophile, zoophile. Regardless of what sexuality I am, the fact that you are a piece of shit remains true.

This used to be an interesting blog -- too bad a number of commenters now wallow in crude personal invective, which just drags everything down.

Laser College:
You should check out the unrated version of Havoc. She gets plenty naked in that movie.

Sullivan might have a point on not having comments. Granted I don't like thinking he ever has much of a point.

You both love cock and men with beards. You've got lots in common, Thomas.

I'm not sure what you mean. I'm celibate and I can't think of many bearded men I was ever attracted to. (What attraction to men I have is mostly my business, I only mentioned it once because it seemed relevant.)

You know on consideration that kind of ticks me off. I'm not liberal. For that matter I'm not even gay. I agree with the notion homosexuality is a disorder within Catholic understanding of sin and the mind.

I never mentioned anything about my sexuality online until this year. I figured I was 30, had stayed celibate, and had alread mentioned periods of mental illness elsewhere. I was thinking admitting some attraction to men was not much worse than admitting I once had a manic episode. As long as I keep any mental abnormality under control it's not that big a deal. In hindsight that was probably frightfully naive. Anything sexual gets you labeled even if you're not into being labeled. Hopefully I won't ever make that mistake again.

Still even if I were into bearded men, or liked dogs or had HIV, that wouldn't mean I'd have to think well of Sullivan.